The Ethics of Payments: Paper, Plastic, or Bitcoin?
Georgetown University - Department of Finance
Douglas M. McCabe
Georgetown University - Department of Management
January 14, 2014
Individuals and businesses make billions of payments every day in various forms. Payers have choices about what forms of payment they will make, and payees also have some flexibility on what they will accept. Different forms of payment involve different costs and benefits for both the payer and the payee. Can it be unethical to use a particular form of payment? Can a payment system like bitcoin be “evil,” as charged by Krugman (2013)? Or does it provide a means for a more trustworthy means of payment? What are the ethical implications of paying workers with one form of payment, such as a fee-laden payroll card, over another? What are the ethical implications of choosing a payment tool, such as a rewards credit card, that imposes higher costs on the merchant? The differential nature of bargaining power between the users and operators of the dominant payment networks also raise ethical questions regarding the fairness of charges in such asymmetric power situations. A payment system, like any tool, is not “evil” by itself; it is the use that matters.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: Financial ethics, payments; interchange fees, debit cards, credit cards, payment cards, scrip, exploitation, bitcoin
JEL Classification: E42working papers series
Date posted: January 16, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.719 seconds