Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2379665
 


 



The Neurobiology of Decision-Making in High Risk Youth & the Law of Consent to Sex


Jennifer Ann Drobac


Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

Leslie A. Hulvershorn


Indiana University School of Medicine - Department of Psychiatry

January 15, 2014

New Crim. L. Rev., Forthcoming
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-2

Abstract:     
Under certain circumstances, the law treats juvenile consent the same as it treats adult decisions, even though a growing body of scientific research demonstrates that children make decisions using less developed cognitive processes. This Article highlights the gaps and deficiencies of legal treatment of juvenile decisions in the context of sex with an adult, as well as integrates new scientific information regarding the decision-making of minors in risky situations. Part I examines recent pediatric brain imaging findings during a risky decision-making task. Specifically, a new study demonstrates that brain scan results differed between juveniles at high risk for potentially harmful or criminal conduct and healthy children. These differences within juvenile populations support the notion that particular biological and environmental traits in children may further distinguish juvenile decision-making from adult decision-making. Part II explores the potential impact of these novel neurobiological findings on the legal treatment of juvenile “consent” to sexual activity. A discussion and summary of the juvenile sex crime statutes of all fifty states demonstrates how the law attributes legal capacity and ability to make legally binding decisions to even very young teenagers. Part II also highlights where state civil and criminal law treat juvenile “consent” inconsistently. Criminal and civil laws’ treatment of juvenile capacity, in the context of sexual activity with an adult, is not congruent with recent neurobiological discoveries regarding juvenile risk-taking and decision-making. Therefore, society should reconsider designations regarding legal capacity in light of novel neurobiological findings regarding decision-making in juveniles.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: neuroscience, consent, juvenile law, sexual harassment law, sex crimes, statutory rape

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 16, 2014 ; Last revised: February 20, 2014

Suggested Citation

Drobac, Jennifer Ann and Hulvershorn, Leslie A., The Neurobiology of Decision-Making in High Risk Youth & the Law of Consent to Sex (January 15, 2014). New Crim. L. Rev., Forthcoming; Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2379665

Contact Information

Jennifer Ann Drobac (Contact Author)
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States
317-278-4777 (Phone)
317-278-7563 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.indylaw.indiana.edu/people/profile.cfm?EmpNum=41

Leslie A. Hulvershorn
Indiana University School of Medicine - Department of Psychiatry ( email )
Riley Hospital for Children
705 Riley Hospital Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 180
Downloads: 49
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. What Is 'Technology'?
By Emily Morris

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.406 seconds