The Fourth Amendment as a Way of Talking About People: A Study of Robinson and Matlock

James Boyd White

University of Michigan at Ann Arbor Law School


Supreme Court Review, Vol. 1974: 165-232

One way to regard what the Supreme Court has done in the cases it has decided under the Fourth Amendment is to say that it has created a specialized discourse of adjudication, a language in which it can talk about and dispose of the repeated conflicts that arise between an officer engaged in the process of crime control and a citizen upon whose freedom or security he intrudes. The events which bring these two figures together are bewildering in their variety and complexity, and the claims on each side are deeply felt and strenuously made. It has not been easy for the Court to work out a coherent way of addressing these conflicts, and the cases accordingly reflect a considerable amount of uncertainty and confusion, especially if one examines the particular results. Can there be found, behind the complex and inconsistent surface of the cases, any general continuities of attitude, any agreed-upon and more or less permanent ways of defining the roles of officer and suspect and of regulating the relationship between them? Such definitions - if they existed in forms of which one could approve - would constitute an important social and intellectual resource, potentially serving as an expression of value and attitude of a far more stable and enduring kind than might at first be thought possible from examination of the cases themselves. I propose to trace some of the difficulties the Court has faced in trying to fashion a coherent discourse of Fourth Amendment adjudication, and to identify certain continuities of attitude. It is against this background that I examine United States v. Robinson and United States v. Matlock, as contributions to the discourse of the Fourth Amendment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Keywords: United States Supreme Court, Fouth Amendment, United States v. Robinson, United States v. Matlock

JEL Classification: K42

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: January 23, 2014  

Suggested Citation

White, James Boyd, The Fourth Amendment as a Way of Talking About People: A Study of Robinson and Matlock (1974). Supreme Court Review, Vol. 1974: 165-232. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2383258

Contact Information

James Boyd White (Contact Author)
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
332 Hutchins Hall
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-936-2989 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 17
Downloads: 1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds