Prevention of Crime and the Optimal Standard of Proof in Criminal Law
LEFIC Working Paper No. 2003-03
40 Pages Posted: 19 Nov 2003
Date Written: October 3, 2003
Abstract
This article determines the optimal standard of proof in criminal law in a trade-off between three costs: the injustice cost of wrong convictions, the injustice cost of wrong acquittals, and the cost to society of the criminal act itself. The standard of proof affects the level of crime through its impact on deterrence and incapacitation. The article applies the expresssion for the optimal standard to the crime of sexual violation against women. For this crime, the concern for preventing crime has a significant effect on the optimal standard of proof.
Note: Previously titled "The Optimal Standard of Proof in Criminal Law When Both Fairness and Deterrence Matter"
JEL Classification: K140, K400, K420
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Does Wrongful Conviction Lower Deterrence?
By Henrik Lando
-
The Optimum Enforcement of Laws and the Concept of Justice: A Positive Analysis
-
The Problematic Value of Mathematical Models of Evidence
By Ronald J. Allen and Michael S. Pardo
-
Punishment Despite Reasonable Doubt - A Public Goods Experiment with Uncertainty Over Contributions
By Kristoffel R. Grechenig, Andreas Nicklisch, ...
-
Punishment Despite Reasonable Doubt - A Public Goods Experiment with Uncertainty Over Contributions
By Kristoffel R. Grechenig, Andreas Nicklisch, ...