A Tempest in a Transatlantic Teapot: A Legal Historian's Critical Analysis of Frédéric Bastien's La Bataille De Londres
York University - Osgoode Hall Law School
January 1, 2014
Osgoode Hall Law Journal 51:2, Forthcoming
Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 8/2014
This review discussed the allegations in Frederic Bastien's book La Bataille de Londres, to the effect that two Supreme Court of Canada judges had improper communications with British and Canadian authorities before and after the hearing of the Patriation Reference. It analyzes in detail the five incidents upon which the allegations are based, and finds that the author's interpretation cannot be supported in four of them because of faulty interpretation of the evidence or incomplete research. The fifth incident, in which Chief Justice Laskin met with the English attorney general, is found to have been arguably inappropriate judicial behaviour, but to have no effect in law on the ultimate decision in the Patriation Reference. In addition, more recent evidence tends to confirm that no "leaks" to the Canadian government occurred while the Court was writing its decision.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 22
Keywords: Patriation Reference, Laskin, Estey, constitutional law, judicial impartiality, Chief Justice
JEL Classification: K1, K19, K39, K40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 28, 2014 ; Last revised: February 20, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds