Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2386292
 


 



A Tempest in a Transatlantic Teapot: A Legal Historian's Critical Analysis of Frédéric Bastien's La Bataille De Londres


Philip Girard


Osgoode Hall Law School - York University

January 1, 2014

Osgoode Hall Law Journal 51:2, Forthcoming
Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 8/2014

Abstract:     
This review discussed the allegations in Frederic Bastien's book La Bataille de Londres, to the effect that two Supreme Court of Canada judges had improper communications with British and Canadian authorities before and after the hearing of the Patriation Reference. It analyzes in detail the five incidents upon which the allegations are based, and finds that the author's interpretation cannot be supported in four of them because of faulty interpretation of the evidence or incomplete research. The fifth incident, in which Chief Justice Laskin met with the English attorney general, is found to have been arguably inappropriate judicial behaviour, but to have no effect in law on the ultimate decision in the Patriation Reference. In addition, more recent evidence tends to confirm that no "leaks" to the Canadian government occurred while the Court was writing its decision.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: Patriation Reference, Laskin, Estey, constitutional law, judicial impartiality, Chief Justice

JEL Classification: K1, K19, K39, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 28, 2014 ; Last revised: February 20, 2014

Suggested Citation

Girard, Philip, A Tempest in a Transatlantic Teapot: A Legal Historian's Critical Analysis of Frédéric Bastien's La Bataille De Londres (January 1, 2014). Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 7/2014; Osgoode Hall Law Journal 51:2, Forthcoming; Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 8/2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2386292

Contact Information

Philip Girard (Contact Author)
Osgoode Hall Law School - York University ( email )
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 319
Downloads: 45

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.735 seconds