Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2388766
 


 



The Model Penal Code's Conceptual Error on the Nature of Proximate Cause, and How to Fix it


Paul H. Robinson


University of Pennsylvania Law School

January 14, 2014

U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-3

Abstract:     
The Model Penal Code reconceptualized proximate cause to see it as part of the offense culpability requirements rather than as, in the traditional view, a minimum requirement for the strength of the connection between the actor's conduct and the prohibited result. That conceptual error, rare in the well-thought-out Model Code, invites misinterpretation and misapplication of the proximate cause provision, and can produce improper liability results. The failure is all the more unfortunate because the Model Code drafters did have an important improvement to offer in dealing with the challenging issue of proximate cause. Their jettison of fixed detailed rules in favor of a useful general standard – "not too remote or accidental in its occurrence to have a [just] bearing on the actor's liability or on the gravity of his offense" – could have significantly simplified and improved proximate cause analysis, but their conceptual error created needless problems that helped lead most states to reject the Model Code provision.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: Criminal law, Model Penal Code, statute, proximate cause, remoteness of causation, culpability, legal cause, too remote or accidental, factual cause

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 2, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Robinson, Paul H., The Model Penal Code's Conceptual Error on the Nature of Proximate Cause, and How to Fix it (January 14, 2014). U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 14-3. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2388766

Contact Information

Paul H. Robinson (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 259
Downloads: 81
Download Rank: 182,731

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds