Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2388824
 


 



The State Constitutionality of Voucher Programs: Religion is Not the Sole Component


Preston C. Green III


University of Connecticut

Peter L. Moran


Independent

January 31, 2014

Green, P., & Moran, P. (2010). The state constitutionality of voucher programs: Religion is not the sole component. Brigham Young University Law and Education Journal, 2010(2), 275-306.

Abstract:     
This article examines state constitutional provisions relating to publicly-funded voucher programs and determines their susceptibility to non-religious-based arguments. This article organizes the provisions relating to publicly-funded voucher programs into three categories: (1) “uniformity provisions,” which require states to provide a uniform system of public schools; (2) “local control provisions,” which delegate the authority to control public schools to local entities; and (3) “funding provisions,” which contain language that prohibits states from funding non-public schools.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 2, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Green, Preston C. and Moran, Peter L., The State Constitutionality of Voucher Programs: Religion is Not the Sole Component (January 31, 2014). Green, P., & Moran, P. (2010). The state constitutionality of voucher programs: Religion is not the sole component. Brigham Young University Law and Education Journal, 2010(2), 275-306.. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2388824

Contact Information

Preston C. Green III (Contact Author)
University of Connecticut ( email )
Peter L. Moran
Independent
No Address Available
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 198
Downloads: 27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds