Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2388998
 


 



Reason Giving and Rule Making in Procedural Law


Robin Effron


Brooklyn Law School

January 31, 2014

Alabama Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 3, Forthcoming
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 294

Abstract:     
Judges are the managers of the cases litigated before them and the administrators of the procedural rules that govern the litigation of cases. This Article investigates problems with the procedural rules closely associated with a judge’s managerial capacity and suggests a new paradigm for crafting and evaluating these rules by drawing on the administrative law principles of reason giving in decisionmaking.

I argue that for certain types of procedural rules, rulemakers should abandon the task of trying to regulate procedure by promulgating rules or standards regarding the desired outcome of the application of the device at issue. Instead, they should turn their attention to regulating the process by which judges make procedural decisions. Borrowing concepts from administrative law, this Article argues that rulemakers should employ the technique of reason giving to regulate select procedural devices. Reason giving and the information it produces can work in tandem in the procedural realm by leveraging a core intuition — that requiring regulators and the regulated to engage in a reasoning process constitutes an effective form of regulation. The Article envisions how rulemakers can promote this sort of process among trial court judges, and how that process can ameliorate some of the problems that rulemakers encounter in current attempts to regulate procedural devices.

The Article concludes by suggesting that commentators rethink the value of precedential opinions in some procedural decisions. Rather than straining to identify uniformity in the application of vague standards, rulemakers should be satisfied that they have regulated an area through the delegation of authority and the promotion of a systematic use of that authority by judges as regulators and regulated subjects. These sorts of decisions have the potential for developing stability and standards in certain areas of procedural law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 2, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Effron, Robin, Reason Giving and Rule Making in Procedural Law (January 31, 2014). Alabama Law Review, Vol. 65, No. 3, Forthcoming; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 294. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2388998

Contact Information

Robin Effron (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 168
Downloads: 41

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.265 seconds