The Debilitating Effect of Exclusive Rights: Patents and Productive Inefficiency
University of Baltimore - School of Law
March 19, 2014
Florida Law Review, Forthcoming
University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015-36
Are we underestimating the costs of patent protection? Scholars have long recognized that patent law is a double-edged sword. While patents promote innovation, they also limit the number of people who can benefit from new inventions. In the past, policymakers striving to balance the costs and benefits of patents have analyzed patent law through the lens of traditional, neoclassical economics. This Article argues that this approach is fundamentally flawed because traditional economics relies on an inaccurate oversimplification: that individuals and firms always maximize profits. In actuality, so-called “productive inefficiencies” often prevent profit maximization. For example, cognitive biases, bounded rationality, habituation, and opportunism all contribute to productive inefficiencies that harm individuals, firms, and ultimately society. Moreover, a variety of theoretical analyses and empirical studies demonstrate that robust competition reduces productive inefficiencies. Consequently, patents that substantially limit competition exacerbate productive inefficiencies, and an important effect of patent law has been systematically overlooked. This Article begins to fill this void and demonstrates that consideration of productive inefficiencies sheds new light on numerous unresolved and contentious debates in patent law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 64
Keywords: patent, innovation, efficiency, economics, neoclassical, cognitive, bounded rationality, experimental use, commercialization, claim construction, patent scope, patent office, examination, competition, rivalry, x-inefficiency, internal efficiency, organizational slack, technical inefficiency
JEL Classification: B13, D61, D21, D24, D4, D6, D8, K00, K33, K39, L1, L2, O00, O1, O3
Date posted: February 2, 2014 ; Last revised: October 15, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds