Consistencies and Inconsistencies in Drafting Questions Referred to the European Court of Justice for Preliminary Rulings by the Romanian Courts

Transylvanian Review, Vol. XIX, Supplement No. 2, 2010

21 Pages Posted: 7 Feb 2014

See all articles by Daniel Mihail Sandru

Daniel Mihail Sandru

Center for European Legal Studies, Legal Research Institute of Romanian Academy

Date Written: November 16, 2010

Abstract

Romania, as a Member State of the European Union, has an indirect contribution to the development of European Union law. The national courts have the capacity and sometimes the obligation to refer preliminary questions, the answers given by the European Court of Justice are a part of the acquis of the Union. The present article tries to asses the contribution of the Romanian courts in this context and aims to underline the drafting of the references as a first step in the cooperation between national and the European court.

Keywords: reference for a preliminary ruling; order of reference; European Court of Justice; judicial co-operation; Article 267 TFEU

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Sandru, Daniel-Mihail, Consistencies and Inconsistencies in Drafting Questions Referred to the European Court of Justice for Preliminary Rulings by the Romanian Courts (November 16, 2010). Transylvanian Review, Vol. XIX, Supplement No. 2, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2392208 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2392208

Daniel-Mihail Sandru (Contact Author)

Center for European Legal Studies, Legal Research Institute of Romanian Academy ( email )

Calea 13 Septembrie nr. 13, sector 5
Bucuresti, 050711
Romania
+ 40726999706 (Phone)
+40213188130 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.csde.ro

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
67
Abstract Views
869
Rank
605,583
PlumX Metrics