Commandeering, Coercion, and the Deep Structure of American Federalism
University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law; University of Wisconsin Law School
February 10, 2014
Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming
Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1249
The anti-commandeering and anti-coercion principles announced in New York v. United States and NFIB v. Sebelius have great potential importance, but the most prominent justification for them is seriously flawed. This Essay elaborates a more persuasive and largely neglected alternative, grounded in the deep structure of American federalism. Simply put, both commandeering and coercive conditional spending transfer control of state governments from their constitutionally designated electoral constituencies to Congress. This threat is probably insufficient to justify the anti-commandeering and anti-coercion principles -- it is only one element of a more complex federalism calculus -- but any persuasive critique or defense of these doctrines must take account of it.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 57
Keywords: Commandeering, Coercion, Conditional Spending, Federalism, Spending PowerAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 11, 2014 ; Last revised: March 18, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.485 seconds