Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2394683
 


 



Big Data and Predictive Reasonable Suspicion


Andrew Guthrie Ferguson


University of the District of Columbia - David A. Clarke School of Law

April 4, 2014

163 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, (2014 Forthcoming)

Abstract:     
The Fourth Amendment requires “reasonable suspicion” to seize a suspect. As a general matter, the suspicion derives from information a police officer observes or knows. It is individualized to a particular person at a particular place. Most reasonable suspicion cases involve police confronting unknown suspects engaged in observable suspicious activities. Essentially, the reasonable suspicion doctrine is based on “small data” – discrete facts involving limited information and little knowledge about the suspect.

But what if this small data is replaced by “big data”? What if police can “know” about the suspect through new networked information sources? Or, what if predictive analytics can forecast who will be the likely troublemakers in a community? The rise of big data technology offers a challenge to the traditional paradigm of Fourth Amendment law. Now, with little effort, most unknown suspects can be “known,” as a web of information can identify and provide extensive personal data about a suspect independent of the officer’s observations. New data sources including law enforcement databases, third party information sources (phone records, rental records, GPS data, video surveillance data, etc.), and predictive analytics, combined with biometric or facial recognition software, means that information about that suspect can be known in a few data searches. At some point, the data (independent of the observation) may become sufficiently individualized and predictive to justify the seizure of a suspect. The question this article poses is can a Fourth Amendment stop be predicated on the aggregation of specific, individualized, but otherwise non-criminal factors?

This article traces the consequences in the shift from a “small data” reasonable suspicion doctrine, focused on specific, observable actions of unknown suspects, to the “big data” reality of an interconnected information rich world of known suspects. With more targeted information, police officers on the streets will have a stronger predictive sense about the likelihood that they are observing criminal activity. This evolution, however, only hints at the promise of big data policing. The next phase will be using existing predictive analytics to target suspects without any actual observation of criminal activity, merely relying on the accumulation of various data points. Unknown suspects will become known, not because of who they are but because of the data they left behind. Using pattern matching techniques through networked databases, individuals will be targeted out of the vast flow of informational data. This new reality subverts reasonable suspicion from being a source of protection against unreasonable stops, to a means of justifying those same stops.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: Big Data, Fourth Amendment, reasonable suspicion, prediction, criminal procedure, criminal law, analytics

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 14, 2014 ; Last revised: April 5, 2014

Suggested Citation

Ferguson, Andrew Guthrie, Big Data and Predictive Reasonable Suspicion (April 4, 2014). 163 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, (2014 Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2394683 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2394683

Contact Information

Andrew Guthrie Ferguson (Contact Author)
University of the District of Columbia - David A. Clarke School of Law ( email )
4200 Connecticut Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20003
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,994
Downloads: 263
Download Rank: 66,009

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds