Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2395912
 


 



Applause for the Plausible


Brandon L. Garrett


University of Virginia School of Law

February 14, 2014

University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online, 2014
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2014-17

Abstract:     
This short essay examines the seemingly contradictory definitions and associations of the word "plausible," which the Supreme Court unexpectedly elevated to a key gatekeeping role for all of federal civil litigation in its rulings altering the pleading standard in Twombly and Iqbal. Justices, judges and commentators have not focused on what "plausible" means, for some good reasons; it carries with it connotations of the "reasonable" and the "fair" but also "superficial," "often specious" and "pretext." I can offer only a plausible defense of the seemingly contradictory meanings of this word deployed to regulate allegations in federal complaints, for which the transparency of its vice is, for better and for worse, its main virtue.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: Pleading, Civil Procedure, Twombly, Iqbal

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 15, 2014 ; Last revised: August 5, 2014

Suggested Citation

Garrett, Brandon L., Applause for the Plausible (February 14, 2014). University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online, 2014; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2014-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2395912

Contact Information

Brandon L. Garrett (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 80
Downloads: 16

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds