Federalism as a Way Station: Windsor as Exemplar of Doctrine in Motion

Neil Siegel

Duke University School of Law

July 10, 2014

6 Journal of Legal Analysis (2014)

This Article asks what the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Windsor stands for. It first shows that the opinion leans in the direction of marriage equality but ultimately resists any dispositive “equality” or “federalism” interpretation. The Article next examines why the opinion seems intended to preserve for itself a Delphic obscurity. The Article reads Windsor as an exemplar of what judicial opinions may look like in transition periods, when a Bickelian Court seeks to invite, not end, a national conversation, and to nudge it in a certain direction. In such times, federalism reasoning and rhetoric — like declining to announce the level of scrutiny and appearing to misapply the justiciability doctrines — may be used as a way station toward a particular later resolution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: Windsor, same-sex marriage, federalism, equal protection, Bickel, passive virtues

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 15, 2014 ; Last revised: December 29, 2014

Suggested Citation

Siegel, Neil, Federalism as a Way Station: Windsor as Exemplar of Doctrine in Motion (July 10, 2014). 6 Journal of Legal Analysis (2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2396179

Contact Information

Neil Siegel (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,642
Downloads: 246
Download Rank: 92,713

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds