Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2396806
 


 



The Unprincipled Randomization Principle in Economics and Medicine


Stephen Ziliak


Roosevelt University

Edward R Teather-Posadas


Roosevelt University - Department of Economics

March 29, 2014

Ziliak, Stephen T., and Teather-Posadas, Edward R. 2014. "The Unprincipled Randomization Principle in Economics and Medicine," Oxford University Press Handbook on Professional Economic Ethics (New York: Oxford), eds. G. DeMartino and D.N. McCloskey, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Over the past decade randomized field experiments have gained prominence in the toolbox of economics and policy making. Yet randomization enthusiasts have paid little attention to the ethical issues, economic costs, and theoretical difficulties caused by the so called randomization principle. Randomized trials give placebos or no treatment at all to vulnerable individuals, withholding best treatments from the control group. Randomization has been proven to be less precise and less efficient than “Student’s” balanced alternatives - particularly when effect sizes and confounding from unobserved systematic effects are large. From medicine to economics, randomized trials are rarely if ever repeated. A good thing, perhaps, given that randomizers are willing to sacrifice the well-being of study participants in order to “learn”. We consider here the ethics and logic of that sacrifice. We present new evidence from a 25 question survey of randomization, statistical significance, and validity we applied to all the full length articles using randomization techniques and published in the American Economic Review, 2000-2009 and New England Journal of Medicine, 2000-2002. A study of history shows that today’s “principle” of randomization was fabricated out of nothing by R.A. Fisher, in a little known battle he waged in the 1920s against W.S. Gosset aka “Student”. We conclude that the most reliable ethical character of economics, Adam Smith’s “impartial spectator,” would not approve of randomized trials as practiced in economics and medicine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: randomization, balance, ethics, Simpson’s paradox, development, field experiments, W.S. Gosset

JEL Classification: A11, B23, C9, C93, O2

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 17, 2014 ; Last revised: March 30, 2014

Suggested Citation

Ziliak, Stephen and Teather-Posadas, Edward R, The Unprincipled Randomization Principle in Economics and Medicine (March 29, 2014). Ziliak, Stephen T., and Teather-Posadas, Edward R. 2014. "The Unprincipled Randomization Principle in Economics and Medicine," Oxford University Press Handbook on Professional Economic Ethics (New York: Oxford), eds. G. DeMartino and D.N. McCloskey, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2396806

Contact Information

Stephen Ziliak (Contact Author)
Roosevelt University ( email )
Chicago, IL 60605
United States
HOME PAGE: http://sites.roosevelt.edu/sziliak
Edward R Teather-Posadas
Roosevelt University - Department of Economics ( email )
430 S. Michigan Ave.
Chicago, IL 60605
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,567
Downloads: 589
Download Rank: 24,161
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.407 seconds