The Case Against Federalizing Trade Secrecy

Christopher B. Seaman

Washington and Lee University School of Law

June 12, 2014

Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming
Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2014-12

Trade secrecy is unique among the major intellectual property (IP) doctrines because it is governed primarily by state law. Recently, however, a number of influential actors — including legislators, academics, and organizations representing IP attorneys and owners — have proposed creating a private civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation under federal law. Proponents assert that federalizing trade secrecy would provide numerous benefits, including substantive uniformity, the availability of a federal forum for misappropriation litigation, and the creation of a unified national regime governing IP rights.

This Article engages in the first systematic critique of the claim that federalizing trade secrecy is normatively desirable. Ultimately, it concludes that there are multiple reasons for trade secrecy to remain primarily the province of state law, including preservation of states’ ability to engage in limited experimentation regarding the scope of trade secret protection and federalization’s potential negative impact on the disclosure of patent-eligible inventions. Finally, it proposes an alternative approach — a modest expansion of federal courts’ jurisdiction over state law trade secret claims — that can help address the issue of trade secret theft without requiring outright federalization.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 75

Keywords: trade secret, trade secrecy, misappropriation, federalization, common law, patent, disclosure, uniformity, legislation, intellectual property, IP, jurisdiction

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K29, K39, O30, O31, O34, O38

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: February 18, 2014 ; Last revised: June 25, 2014

Suggested Citation

Seaman, Christopher B., The Case Against Federalizing Trade Secrecy (June 12, 2014). Virginia Law Review, Forthcoming; Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2014-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2397567 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2397567

Contact Information

Christopher B. Seaman (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University School of Law ( email )
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
540-458-8520 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,036
Downloads: 203
Download Rank: 86,957
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.593 seconds