Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2403315
 


 



When God Demands Blood: Unusual Minds and the Troubled Juridical Ties of Religion, Madness, and Culpability


Rabia Belt


University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Law School - Alumni

September 18, 2014


Abstract:     
The deific decree doctrine allows criminal defendants who believe that God commanded them to kill to plead not guilty by reason of insanity to murder. The insanity defense has remained moored to its Judeo-Christian roots, which has artificially limited its bounds. While civil law has focused on individualism within religion, criminal law has imposed state-defined limits on what religion (or socially acceptable religion) is. This Article argues that the deific decree doctrine is too closely tied to artificial limits on insanity imposed by 19th century developments in the mental health profession and criminal law. The doctrine unacceptably privileges certain mentally ill criminal defendants whose delusions fit within an outdated model that is not psychiatrically valid. Moreover, it has disparate gender consequences that harm women with postpartum psychosis who kill their children while supporting men who kill their female partners. The Article concludes by calling for the end of the deific decree doctrine and expanding the insanity defense so it more accurately tracks psychiatric understanding of mental illness.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Criminal Law, Law and Psychiatry, Law and Religion, Gender and the Law, Legal History

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 5, 2014 ; Last revised: September 20, 2014

Suggested Citation

Belt, Rabia, When God Demands Blood: Unusual Minds and the Troubled Juridical Ties of Religion, Madness, and Culpability (September 18, 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2403315 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2403315

Contact Information

Rabia Belt (Contact Author)
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Law School - Alumni ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 646
Downloads: 126
Download Rank: 136,109
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Will There Be a Neurolaw Revolution?
By Adam Kolber

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds