Judicial Review and Non-Enforcement at the Founding
Matthew J. Steilen
State University of New York (SUNY) at Buffalo, Law School
March 24, 2014
University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 17, p. 479, November 2014
SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-020
This Article examines the relationship between judicial review and presidential non-enforcement of statutory law. Defenders of non-enforcement regularly argue that the justification for judicial review that prevailed at the time of the founding also justifies the president in declining to enforce unconstitutional laws. The argument is unsound. This Article shows that there is essentially no historical evidence, from ratification through the first decade under the Constitution, in support of a non-enforcement power. It also shows that the framers repeatedly made statements inconsistent with the supposition that the president could refuse to enforce laws he deemed unconstitutional. In contrast, during this same period the historical record contains hundreds of discussions of judicial review. The Article then advances an explanation of why there was considerable support for judicial review but none for non-enforcement. Judicial review followed from what that generation called “expounding” the law, which meant explaining it. A court was supposed to explain the law in the course of deciding a case. Explaining the law involved examining all potentially relevant legal rules and showing how they fit together to deductively justify the judgment reached. In that context, if a statute could not be reconciled with the constitution, it would not be given effect. Since the president neither decided cases nor expounded the law, he did not enjoy a power of non-enforcement parallel to the power of judicial review.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 90
Keywords: judicial review, non-enforcement, expounding, expound, exposition, case or controversy, Jefferson, Madison, Kamper v. HawkinsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 4, 2014 ; Last revised: November 20, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.328 seconds