Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2404031
 


 



The Mechanics of First Amendment Audience Analysis


David S. Han


Pepperdine University School of Law

March 3, 2014

55 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1647 (2014)
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014/14

Abstract:     
When the government seeks to regulate speech based on its content, it generally does so on an assumption that listeners will process the speech in a manner that produces social harm. Because the chain of causation for such speech-based harm runs through the filter of an audience, courts must constantly make judgments regarding the audience’s reception of such speech. How will the speech be interpreted by the audience? To what extent will the speech cause the audience either to suffer direct emotional harm or to react physically to the speech in a harmful manner? Although this sort of inquiry — which I refer to as “audience analysis” — is integral in resolving a broad range of First Amendment issues, there has been little, if any, holistic examination of its general position and role within First Amendment jurisprudence.

In this Article, I first seek to introduce a degree of theoretical and doctrinal clarity to this aspect of speech causation. After tracing the primary causal paths by which speech may give rise to social harm on account of its content, I observe that each of these paths requires courts to make judgments regarding the audience’s comprehension of, or sensitivity to, the speech in question. I then outline how such analysis currently fits within First Amendment doctrine. Depending on the case, audience analysis can take place either at the front end, in the process of categorizing “borderline” speech, or at the back end, in the application of more generalized scrutiny analysis. These sorts of analyses often look very different from each other, and I delineate the different ways in which courts have approached them.

I then propose that audience analysis should generally be governed by a simple principle: courts should seek to determine, as accurately as possible, the extent to which the targeted audience would foreseeably process the regulated speech in a manner that produces social harm. In other words, courts should strive to conduct audience analysis based on a predictive view of how the targeted audience will likely process the speech, rather than on a strong normative view of how an idealized “rational audience” should process the speech. I argue that this basic principle should shape the tests that courts adopt to define low-value speech, promote greater solicitude for analyzing empirical data in scrutiny-stage audience analyses, and ultimately produce a more transparent jurisprudence that will provide courts with a clearer picture of the actual costs of speech in a wide range of circumstances.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 71

Keywords: First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, Constitutional Law, Tort Law

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 4, 2014 ; Last revised: May 28, 2014

Suggested Citation

Han, David S., The Mechanics of First Amendment Audience Analysis (March 3, 2014). 55 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1647 (2014); Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014/14. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2404031

Contact Information

David S. Han (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 297
Downloads: 59
Download Rank: 221,019
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Free Speech Constitutionalism
By Alexander Tsesis

2. The First Amendment's Public Forum
By John Inazu

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.265 seconds