Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2404492
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Regulating Systemic Risk in Insurance


Daniel Schwarcz


University of Minnesota Law School

Steven L. Schwarcz


Duke University School of Law

December 30, 2014

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 4, 2014
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-18

Abstract:     
As exemplified by the dramatic failure of AIG, insurance companies and their affiliates played a central role in the 2008 global financial crisis. It is therefore not surprising that the Dodd-Frank Act — the United States’ primary legislative response to the crisis — contained an entire title dedicated to insurance regulation, which has traditionally been the responsibility of individual states. The most important insurance-focused reforms in Dodd-Frank empower the Federal Reserve Bank to impose an additional layer of regulatory scrutiny on top of state insurance regulation for a small number of “systemically important” nonbank financial companies, such as AIG. This Article argues, however, that in focusing on the risk that an individual insurance-focused, nonbank financial company could become systemically significant, Dodd-Frank largely overlooked a second, and equally important, potential source of systemic risk in insurance: the prospect that correlations among individual insurance companies could contribute to or cause widespread financial instability. In fact, this Article argues that there are often substantial correlations among individual insurance companies with respect to both their interconnections with the larger financial system and their vulnerabilities to failure. As a result, the insurance industry as a whole can pose systemic risks that regulation should attempt to identify and manage. Traditional state-based insurance regulation, this Article contends, is poorly adapted to accomplishing this given the mismatch between state boundaries and systemic risks, as well as states’ limited oversight of noninsurance financial markets. As such, this Article suggests enhancing the power of the Federal Insurance Office — a federal entity primarily charged with monitoring the insurance industry — into supplement or preempt state law when states have failed to satisfactorily address gaps or deficiencies in insurance regulation that could contribute to systemic risk.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 72


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 6, 2014 ; Last revised: January 10, 2015

Suggested Citation

Schwarcz, Daniel and Schwarcz, Steven L., Regulating Systemic Risk in Insurance (December 30, 2014). University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 81, No. 4, 2014; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2404492 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2404492

Contact Information

Daniel B. Schwarcz
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Steven L. Schwarcz (Contact Author)
Duke University School of Law ( email )
210 Science Drive
Box 90362
Durham, NC 27708
United States
919-613-7060 (Phone)
919-613-7231 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,533
Downloads: 732
Download Rank: 20,620
Citations:  1

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.359 seconds