Presidential Appointments and Public Trust

Gary E. Hollibaugh Jr.

University of Notre Dame - Department of Political Science

August 5, 2015

Despite their responsibility for federal policy implementation in the United States, little research has focused on how presidential nominees and appointees affect public opinion. This study offers the first systematic examination of this overlooked phenomenon. Using a survey with an embedded experimental manipulation, we find that perceived nominee competence is associated with increased trust in the administration in general and the individual nominees in particular, whereas perceptions of favoritism or patronage — characterized here as the nomination of campaign fundraisers — are associated with decreased levels of trust in the same. Notably, perceived nominee ideology has no perceptible effect on either trust in the administration or the nominees themselves.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 96

Keywords: presidency, appointments, trust, public opinion, mturk, survey experiments, experiments, online experiments

JEL Classification: D70, D72, D79

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 7, 2014 ; Last revised: August 12, 2015

Suggested Citation

Hollibaugh, Gary E., Presidential Appointments and Public Trust (August 5, 2015). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2405202 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2405202

Contact Information

Gary Edward Hollibaugh Jr. (Contact Author)
University of Notre Dame - Department of Political Science ( email )
217 O'Shaughnessy Hall
Notre Dame, IN 46556
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.garyhollibaugh.com
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 268
Downloads: 40

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.281 seconds