Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2410977
 


 



Transporting Oil and Gas: U.S. Infrastructure Challenges


Alexandra B. Klass


University of Minnesota Law School

Danielle Meinhardt


University of Minnesota Law School - Joint Degree Program in Law, Science & Technology

March 18, 2014

Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-17

Abstract:     
This article explores the history and geography of oil and natural gas to help explain why the U.S. physical and regulatory infrastructure for transporting these two similar types of energy resources to markets developed so differently. Notably, while interstate natural gas pipelines are reviewed and permitted at the federal level by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), interstate oil pipelines are reviewed and permitted almost exclusively at the state level. These regulatory differences, along with differences in the physical properties of the two energy resources, have resulted in very different energy transportation infrastructures and concerns for each resource. This inquiry is critical in light of the complete transformation of the U.S. energy economy over the past five years. Starting in 2009, hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have allowed massive development of oil and natural gas in parts of the country that were not major oil and gas producers, and on a scale that could not have been contemplated less than a decade ago. This article concludes that the regulatory siting regime for oil pipelines at the state level and for natural gas pipelines at the federal level are generally both sufficient in their respective arenas to facilitate construction of new oil and gas pipelines when market forces allow. What is lacking however, are sufficient regulations or economic incentives under state or federal environmental laws to ensure that necessary natural gas transportation infrastructure is built in oil rich areas like North Dakota to capture the natural gas produced with oil. In the absence of such incentives, producers flare large amounts of natural gas into the atmosphere because of its relatively lower market value as compared to oil and the absence of gathering pipelines or other localized collection systems in producing areas. Likewise, the lack of oil transportation infrastructure in new producing areas has resulted in two-thirds of the oil produced in those regions traveling by rail instead of by pipeline, up from zero only a few years ago. This has resulted in high profile rail accidents leading to numerous deaths, explosions, and evacuations of towns. This article makes several proposals that draw on the complex history of transporting oil and gas in order to create a transportation infrastructure for the future that matches the realities of today’s new production technologies and geographies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: oil, petroleum, natural gas, oil pipelines, natural gas pipelines, shale gas, shale oil, FERC, Keystone XL Pipeline, Bakken Shale, fracking, hydraulic fracturing, LNG, energy, transportation, rail

JEL Classification: K11, K32, Q3, Q4

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 20, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Klass, Alexandra B. and Meinhardt, Danielle, Transporting Oil and Gas: U.S. Infrastructure Challenges (March 18, 2014). Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2410977

Contact Information

Alexandra B. Klass (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-625-0155 (Phone)
Danielle Meinhardt
University of Minnesota Law School - Joint Degree Program in Law, Science & Technology ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 396
Downloads: 110
Download Rank: 145,410

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds