Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2412103
 


 



Formalism and Distrust: Foreign Affairs Law in the Roberts Court


Harlan Grant Cohen


University of Georgia School of Law

March 20, 2014

George Washington Law Review, Vol. 83, 2015, Forthcoming
UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-12

Abstract:     
When it comes to foreign relations, the Roberts Court has trust issues. As far as the Court is concerned, everyone — the President, Congress, the lower courts, plaintiffs — has played hard and fast with the rules, taking advantage of the Court’s functionalist approaches to foreign affairs issues. This seems to be the message of the Roberts Court foreign affairs law jurisprudence.

The Roberts Court has been active in foreign affairs law, deciding cases on the detention and trial of enemy combatants, foreign sovereign immunity, the domestic effect of treaties, the extraterritorial reach of federal statutes, the preemption of state laws, and the scope of the political question doctrine, among others. Looking back at those decisions, this Article notes and explores a stark and surprising trend. Across a string of decisions, from Hamdan v. Rumsfeld through Medellin v. Texas, Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Zivotofsky v. Clinton, Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., and Bond v. United States, the Court has jettisoned its traditional foreign affairs functionalism in favor of formalism.

The shift, as the Article explains, is not merely rhetorical or stylistic. Embedded within these opinions is a deep distrust of the Executive Branch, Congress, and the courts. And embraced by a surprising number of Justices across different wings of the Court, this formalism of distrust has brought constraints on the discretion of federal government deeper and more powerful than have been seen in some time. Foreign affairs formalism,with all of its implications, is the new reality — one that must be understood and watched.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: national security, foreign affairs, international law, executive power, Supreme Court, constitutional law, functionalist, formalist, executive branch

JEL Classification: K19, K3

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 22, 2014 ; Last revised: July 19, 2014

Suggested Citation

Cohen, Harlan Grant, Formalism and Distrust: Foreign Affairs Law in the Roberts Court (March 20, 2014). George Washington Law Review, Vol. 83, 2015, Forthcoming; UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2412103

Contact Information

Harlan Grant Cohen (Contact Author)
University of Georgia School of Law ( email )
Hirsch Hall
Athens, GA 30602
United States
706-542-5166 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 520
Downloads: 113
Download Rank: 142,406

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.500 seconds