Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2413020
 


 



Is Tort Law a Form of Institutionalized Revenge?


Gabriel Mendlow


University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - University of Michigan Law School; University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Philosophy

June 2011

Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2011

Abstract:     
Viewed in a certain light, tort law serves primarily to give injury victims a means of imposing onerous burdens on their injurers. Through the remedy of injunction, tort law enables victims to restrict their injurers' freedom of action, and through the remedies of damages and restitution, tort law enables victims to deprive their injurers of money and other things of value. Moreover, tort law distinctively grants victims themselves the power to impose these burdens, rather than reserving prosecutorial discretion to the state. These features of tort law invite the charge that tort law is essentially a form of institutionalized revenge. If sound, this charge is damning. Most would agree that institutions of revenge have no place in a just society, and even those who might see a place for such institutions would likely find tort law to be a poor candidate. Because tort liability is assessed by an objective standard, a standard that generally pays no heed to a defendant's individual capacities or to the moral quality of a defendant's motivation, tort law enables victims to exact a remedy from injurers who are only slightly blameworthy or even morally innocent-injurers no one would regard as appropriate objects of revenge. Behind this line of criticism lies a simple and perhaps arresting argument. The revenge argument, as we might call it, relies on two key premises: one about tort remedies, the other about tort plaintiffs. Premise 1: Tort remedies inflict harm on tortfeasors. Premise 2: Plaintiffs are motivated to seek tort remedies by a desire to inflict harm. Conclusion: Tort law is a form of institutionalized revenge. The revenge argument seems to resonate with many people, so it is an argument worth taking seriously. It nevertheless has two troublesome characteristics: the premises are doubtful, and, even if they are true, they provide no support for the conclusion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: tort, revenge

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 23, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Mendlow, Gabriel, Is Tort Law a Form of Institutionalized Revenge? (June 2011). Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2413020

Contact Information

Gabriel Mendlow (Contact Author)
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
University of Michigan at Ann Arbor - Department of Philosophy ( email )
Ann Arbor, MI
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 39
Downloads: 6

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds