The Authoritarian Logic of Regulatory Pluralism: Understanding China's New Environmental Actors
Benjamin Van Rooij
University of California, Irvine School of Law; Leiden University - Leiden Law School
Rachel E. Stern
University of California, Berkeley - Department of Jurisprudence & Social Policy
University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Law
March 21, 2014
Regulation & Governance, 2014, Forthcoming
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2014-26
Over the last decade, Chinese citizens, NGOs, judges and prosecutors have started to take action against industrial pollution, pluralizing the regulatory landscape originally occupied by administrative agencies. Regulatory pluralism here has an authoritarian logic, occurring without the retreat of party-state control. Under such logic, the party-state both needs and fears new actors for their positive and negative roles in controlling risk and maintaining stability. Consequently, the regime’s relation to regulatory pluralism is ambivalent, shifting between support and restriction. This prevents a development of a regulatory society that could bypass the regulatory state. Theoretically, this paper argues for a subjective definition of regulation in a context of pluralism. Moreover, it finds that regulatory pluralism need not coincide with a decentring of regulation. Finally, it highlights how entry onto the regulatory landscape affects the non-regulatory roles of new actors, creating unintended consequences for regulatory pluralism.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Date posted: March 26, 2014 ; Last revised: December 3, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.344 seconds