Close-Out Netting, Insolvency Law and Conflict of Laws
London School of Economics - Law Department
July 15, 2014
Forthcoming in Journal of Corporate Law Studies (JCLS) 2014-II
LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 14/2014
Close-out netting is a risk mitigation tool used by financial institutions. It is comparable to set-off and in insolvency situations any solvent counter-party that is able to use it obtains a very strong position as compared to other creditors. Therefore, it might conflict with the pari passu principle. Many jurisdictions have solved that conflict and adapted their laws so that close-out netting is enforceable even in the event of insolvency. However, as the financial market is global, the parties, their branches and assets might be located in different jurisdictions. Still, countries failed to agree on a harmonised conflict-of laws rule, despite the obvious need, when they decided not to include a conflict-of-laws principle in the 2013 Unidroit Principles on the Operation of Close-out Netting Provisions. The relevant EU law, though patchy, already addresses this concern. This Article identifies the underlying conceptual difficulties and proposes a solution for an improved framework for both the EU and other financial marketplaces.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 26, 2014 ; Last revised: August 5, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.407 seconds