Election Law's Lochnerian Turn

Ellen D. Katz

University of Michigan Law School

April 2, 2014

Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming
U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 400

Part of a discussion on electoral “dysfunction,” this Essay suggests that the Roberts Court has come to view a good deal of contemporary electoral regulation as impermissibly redistributive. The Court, moreover, sees the type of political participation displaced by many contemporary regulations as a neutral baseline against which to gauge challenged regulations rather than itself the product of affirmative regulation. Put differently, this Essay presses the claim that the present Court confronts contemporary efforts to regulate the electoral process much like the Lochner Court approached progressive wage and hour legislation a century ago. It suggests that much of what the Roberts Court has been up to in the electoral arena may be explained by the dominant understanding of the Lochner era.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: April 3, 2014 ; Last revised: May 14, 2014

Suggested Citation

Katz, Ellen D., Election Law's Lochnerian Turn (April 2, 2014). Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming; U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 400. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2419510

Contact Information

Ellen Katz (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
LR 960
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-647-6241 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 394
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 154,760

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.265 seconds