Harmonizing Third-Party Litigation Funding Regulation

52 Pages Posted: 4 Apr 2014 Last revised: 10 Mar 2015

Date Written: February 2015

Abstract

Third-party litigation funding is no longer a new phenomenon, but rather is a mainstay in global commerce and dispute resolution. Yet, many observers still consider the third-party litigation funding industry as a "wild west" due to a lack of regulation in many countries. Some of the countries that have regulations suffer from a lack of uniformity and an array of conflicting laws at the sub-national level (i.e., the laws of states, provinces, territories, etc.). For example, the United States has a confusing patchwork of state laws on third-party litigation funding. This article proposes harmonizing the regulatory framework for third-party litigation funding in the United States by identifying the three categories of interactions – transactional, procedural, and ethical – that make up third-party litigation funding and suggesting avenues for regulation within those three categories. This approach will weave a regulatory "safety net" of minimum standards for the behaviors and interactions of the players in third-party litigation funding arrangements to ensure the integrity of the dispute resolution system in which they invest and participate.

Keywords: third-party litigation funding, litigation funding, litigation, arbitration, investment, securities, ethics, procedure, federal rules of civil procedure, model rules of professional responsibility, regulation

JEL Classification: K40, K41, K42, K49, K00, K10, K19, K13, K20, K29

Suggested Citation

Sahani, Victoria, Harmonizing Third-Party Litigation Funding Regulation (February 2015). 36 Cardozo L. Rev. 861 (2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2419686

Victoria Sahani (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
768
Abstract Views
3,935
Rank
60,435
PlumX Metrics