Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2420439
 


 



The Issue Class


Joseph Seiner


University of South Carolina School of Law

April 4, 2014

56 B.C. L. Rev. (2015 Forthcoming)

Abstract:     
In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011), the Supreme Court refused to certify a proposed class of one and a half million female workers who had alleged that the nation’s largest private employer had discriminated against them on the basis of their sex. The academic response to the case has been highly critical of the Court’s decision. This paper does not weigh in on the debate of whether the Court missed the mark. Instead, this Article addresses a more fundamental question that has gone completely unexplored. Given that Wal-Mart is detrimental to plaintiffs, what is the best tool currently available for workers to pursue systemic employment discrimination claims?

Surveying the case law and federal rules, this paper identifies one little used procedural tool that offers substantial potential to workplace plaintiffs seeking to pursue systemic claims — issue class certification. Rule 23(c)(4)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits the issue class, allowing common issues in a class case to be certified while the remaining issues are litigated separately. The issue class is typically used where a case has a common set of facts but the plaintiffs have suffered varying degrees of harm. This is precisely the situation presented by many workplace class action claims.

This paper explains how the issue class is particularly useful for systemic discrimination claims. The paper further examines why traditional class treatment often fails in workplace cases, and addresses how the plaintiffs in Wal-Mart could have benefited from issue class certification. Finally, this Article discusses some of the implications of using the issue class in employment cases, and situates the paper in the context of the broader academic scholarship. This paper seeks to fill the current void in the academic scholarship by identifying one overlooked way for plaintiffs to navigate around the Supreme Court’s decision.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Employment Discrimination, class action, issue class certification, Wal-Mart, Dukes

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 6, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Seiner, Joseph, The Issue Class (April 4, 2014). 56 B.C. L. Rev. (2015 Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2420439

Contact Information

Joseph A. Seiner (Contact Author)
University of South Carolina School of Law ( email )
Main & Greene Streets
Columbia, SC 29208
United States
(803) 777-5569 (Phone)
(803) 777-2368 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.sc.edu/faculty/seiner/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 351
Downloads: 73
Download Rank: 194,672

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds