A Framework on Mandating versus Incentivizing Corporate Social Responsibility
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
Karen E. Woody
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP; Georgetown University Law Center
April 9, 2014
Marquette Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 1667-1694, 2015
There are two primary but different methods of controlling behavior, whether it is the behavior of individuals or corporations: to incentivize it or to regulate it. Governments are in a unique position to employ either or both options because of their ability to pass regulatory schemes and to extend tax incentives. This article analyzes the two methods of shaping corporate behavior, examining the regulation issue through the case of the conflict minerals provision of the Dodd Frank Act and examining the taxation issue through several examples of corporate tax incentives. This article contributes to this field of literature by setting out a framework for analyzing the efficacy of regulations and incentives directed at shaping corporate behavior and corporate social responsibility.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: corporations, corporate tax, tax, taxation, incentive, Dodd Frank, regulation, corporate social responsibility, corporate behavior
Date posted: April 11, 2014 ; Last revised: September 17, 2015
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.344 seconds