Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2423683
 


 



Going Public After the JOBS Act


Carlos Berdejo


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

August 1, 2014

76 Ohio St. L.J. ___, Forthcoming
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2014-28

Abstract:     
The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (JOBS Act) represents one of the most comprehensive overhauls of the securities laws in recent years. One of the principal goals of the JOBS Act is to improve access to the capital markets for smaller issuers, referred to in the act as emerging growth companies, or EGCs. To accomplish this goal, the JOBS Act seeks to reduce the costs of conducting a public offering and complying with the ensuing reporting obligations by making certain disclosure requirements voluntary for EGCs.

This Article examines whether these scaled disclosure rules have increased the number of small issuers conducting an initial public offering (IPO) of their equity securities and the extent to which these issuers have taken advantage of the various exemptions available to them under the JOBS Act. The evidence presented in this Article shows that EGCs have increasingly taken advantage of several of the scaled disclosure provisions of the JOBS Act during their IPOs. EGCs that take advantage of these scaled disclosure provisions are smaller, younger and more likely to belong to the R&D-intensive pharmaceutical industry. Notably, despite the fact that EGCs are embracing these scaled disclosure provisions, there has not been a noticeable increase in the proportion of IPOs conducted by issuers that qualify as EGCs. The Article explores two interrelated explanations for these seemingly contradictory findings.

First, the evidence indicates that the benefits of the JOBS Act may not be as significant as may have been expected. While the direct costs of conducting an IPO have not decreased for EGCs following the enactment of the JOBS Act, indirect costs may have actually increased. In addition, by their second fiscal year, over forty percent of issuers that went public as EGCs no longer qualify for such status, a fact that limits the expected ongoing benefits of the JOBS Act at the going public decision stage. Second, certain issuers that qualify for EGC status may be choosing to pursue private offerings, which certain provisions of the JOBS Act facilitate. Changes in the mix of small issuers going public following the enactment of the JOBS Act suggest such a shift in the pattern of going public decisions across firms.
.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 77

Keywords: JOBS Act, Initial Public Offerings (IPOs), Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs)

JEL Classification: K22, G28

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 11, 2014 ; Last revised: August 5, 2014

Suggested Citation

Berdejo, Carlos, Going Public After the JOBS Act (August 1, 2014). 76 Ohio St. L.J. ___, Forthcoming; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2014-28. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2423683

Contact Information

Carlos Berdejo (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 563
Downloads: 117
Download Rank: 140,868
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.437 seconds