Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2426394
 


 



The Best of All Possible Worlds? - A Rejoinder to Justice Liu


Daniel J. Bussel


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

April 17, 2014

61 UCLA Law Review 1270 (2014)
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 14-03

Abstract:     
This Rejoinder defends the thesis of Opinions First -- Argument Afterwards by addressing criticisms raised by Justice Goodwin Liu in his forthcoming article How the California Supreme Court Actually Works: A Reply to Professor Bussel, 61 UCLA Law Review (2014).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: California Supreme Court, judicial opinions, judicial procedure, constitutional law, appellate process

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 19, 2014 ; Last revised: June 4, 2014

Suggested Citation

Bussel, Daniel J., The Best of All Possible Worlds? - A Rejoinder to Justice Liu (April 17, 2014). 61 UCLA Law Review 1270 (2014); UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 14-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2426394

Contact Information

Daniel J. Bussel (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-7977 (Phone)
310-825-6023 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 261
Downloads: 83
Download Rank: 178,767

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds