How Roe v. Wade Was Written

David J. Garrow

University of Pittsburgh - School of Law

April 18, 2014

Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 893, 2014
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-17

Let me begin with one sentence that Justice Harry A. Blackmun uttered in 1987: “Roe against Wade was not such a revolutionary opinion at the time” that it was handed down in January 1973, and in that statement Justice Blackmun was indisputably correct.

In early May 1971, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Roe v. Wade from Texas and Doe v. Bolton from Georgia. Both had been filed in early 1970 and had then come before special three-judge district courts from which direct appeal to the Supreme Court was possible following the panels’ denials of injunctive relief. Both panels had nonetheless ruled against the existing Texas and Georgia abortion statutes, and with a plethora of other abortion cases already docketed before the High Court — including ones from Louisiana, Missouri, and Illinois — and others known to be looming, it was unsurprising that five Justices — Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, White, and Marshall — voted to accept both Roe and Doe for argument on the merits come October Term 1971.

It is ironic that Harry Blackmun, who has gone down in history first and overwhelmingly foremost as the author of Roe v. Wade, privately opposed making the case’s holding anywhere near as extensive as his final opinion actually came to be. Equally notable, a strong and poignant counterfactual argument can be made that an actual majority of the Roe Court — Blackmun, William O. Douglas, the reluctant Warren Burger and the two actual dissenters, Byron White and William Rehnquist — would have preferred a holding that reached only to the end of the first trimester. But, instead, the more strongly articulated preferences of Lewis Powell, William Brennan, Thurgood Marshall’s chambers, and Potter Stewart decisively prevailed as Blackmun, encouraged also by his clerk Randall Bezanson, moved to adopt U.S. District Judge Jon O. Newman’s influential emphasis in a just-decided Connecticut abortion case, Abele v. Markle, concerning the decisiveness of fetal viability. That a supposedly conservative, southern appointee of Republican President Richard M. Nixon, in tandem with a Roman Catholic justice named to the Court by Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower, made Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton dramatically more far-reaching than they would have been had Harry Blackmun adhered to the view of pregnancy he brought to those 1972 discussions further underscores how ironic indeed it is that Roe and Doe came to be what they were on January 22, 1973.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: Legal history, Roe v. Wade, Doe v. Bolton, Supreme Court, constitutional interpretation, abortion, reproductive rights, women's rights, privacy, individual rights, right to life, liberties, politics, common law, judicial decision-making, legislative interpretation, due process, equal protection

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K30, K39

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 27, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Garrow, David J., How Roe v. Wade Was Written (April 18, 2014). Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 893, 2014; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2426564

Contact Information

David J. Garrow (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,020
Downloads: 138
Download Rank: 146,448

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.281 seconds