Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2427038
 


 



The Ideology Behind Brown v. Board of Education: Political Parties and 'Jurisprudential Bundling'


Stuart Chinn


University of Oregon School of Law

April 20, 2014

92 DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW (2015), Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Brown encompassed the start of a transformative period of political change, where the federal judiciary and Congress succeeded in dismantling Jim Crow. Yet, the question of why Brown occurred, when it did, continues to evade a fully satisfying answer despite all of the scholarly commentary devoted to it.

This paper illuminates a set of ideological influences behind the Brown ruling that help explain why the Court took the direction that it did, when the opportunity to do so arose. My claim is that the result in Brown might be partly understood as emanating from certain core elements of American political party ideology. These four elements were: a) the acceptance of a "class political" ideal, or the belief that law and public policies should promote the interests of certain social groups; b) the acceptance of a non-southern orientation toward class politics; c) a commitment to federal governmental statism, or the use of federal governmental power to promote desirable social goals; and d) a principled acceptance of the Supreme Court fulfilling, at times, a "rationalizing" function with respect to established legal doctrines.

These four ideas were core components of New Deal Democratic Party ideology that, I argue, provided a conceptual foundation for both the Brown decision in 1954 and the New Deal Democratic commitment to a form of economic liberalism in the 1930s. These four ideological elements thus allowed New Deal economic liberalism to be "jurisprudentially bundled" with racial liberalism among the Brown Court members.

After laying out these four ideological elements, I discuss several significant implications that stem from illuminating the links between these two historical periods. The most important implication is my proposal of "jurisprudential bundling" as a general theory of judicial behavior and constitutional development. The paper concludes by suggesting, more broadly, how ideas are capable of exerting autonomous influence upon the development of constitutional doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 21, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Chinn, Stuart, The Ideology Behind Brown v. Board of Education: Political Parties and 'Jurisprudential Bundling' (April 20, 2014). 92 DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW (2015), Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2427038 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2427038

Contact Information

Stuart Chinn (Contact Author)
University of Oregon School of Law ( email )
1515 Agate Street
Eugene, OR 97403
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 463
Downloads: 50

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds