Probability, Professionalism, and Protecting Taxpayers
Dennis J. Ventry Jr.
University of California, Davis - School of Law
Bradley T. Borden
Brooklyn Law School
April 21, 2014
Tax Lawyer, Vol. 68, No. 3, 2014
UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 377
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 385
This Article — the first in a three-part series — analyzes the affirmative and disciplinary duties imposed on tax lawyers that require them to make probability assessments about the merits of a client’s tax position or tax-favored transaction and to reflect those estimates with numerical precision. It describes how the Treasury, Congress, and the American Bar Association (often in concert, occasionally at odds) forged this obligatory standard of care over the last three decades with the shared goal of facilitating accurate advice, accurate reporting positions, and compliance with the law. The resulting regulatory standard of care (which swept aside the old regime of self-regulation) assists tax lawyers in avoiding flawed methodological processes and in minimizing psychological biases and misaligned incentives that can distort professional judgment. In this way, the standard of care for tax lawyers — particularly its emphasis on improving accuracy and reducing errors by updating subjective beliefs with new, relevant information — reflects a branch of probabilistic decision theory known as Bayesian reasoning.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 103
Date posted: April 23, 2014 ; Last revised: February 19, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds