Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2428775
 
 

References (27)



 


 



Demand for Breach


Tess Wilkinson‐Ryan


University of Pennsylvania Law School

April 20, 2014

U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 14-19

Abstract:     
These studies elicit behavioral evidence for how people weigh monetary and non-monetary incentives in efficient breach. Study 1 is an experimental game designed to capture the salient features of the efficient breach decision. Subjects in a behavioral lab were offered different amounts of money to break the deal they had made with a partner. 18.6% of participants indicated willingness to break a deal for any amount of profit, 27.9% were unwilling to breach for the highest payout, and the remaining subjects identified a break-point in between. Study 2 is an online questionnaire asking subjects to take the perspectives of buyers or sellers considering a profitable breach of contract. The results were consistent with Study 1, yielding a demand curve for breach. I conclude by proposing a research agenda that investigates in a systematic way how individuals make legal decisions in the face of competing norms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: contracts, behavioral economics, psychology, promises, rational self-interest v. moral duty, moral/financial tradeoffs, empirical studies, characteristics of the breacher and the breach, characteristics of the non-breaching party, consequences of breach, preference endogeneity, competing norms

JEL Classification: C91, D86, K12, L14

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 26, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Wilkinson‐Ryan, Tess, Demand for Breach (April 20, 2014). U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 14-19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2428775 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428775

Contact Information

Tess Wilkinson-Ryan (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 212
Downloads: 56
Download Rank: 226,730
References:  27

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds