Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2432314
 


 



Reducing Livability: How Sustainability Planning Threatens the American Dream


Randal O'Toole


Cato Institute

October 28, 2013

Policy Analysis No. 740

Abstract:     
In response to state laws and federal incentives, cities and metropolitan areas across the country are engaged in "sustainability planning" aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In many if not most cases, this planning seeks to reshape urban areas to reduce the amount of driving people do. In general, this means increasing urban population densities and in particular replacing low-density neighborhoods in transit corridors with dense, mixed-use developments. Such planning tramples on property rights and personal preferences. To increase urban area densities, planners use containment policies such as urban-growth boundaries or greenbelts.

To make matters worse, these policies are simply not effective at reducing green house gas emissions. Plan Bay Area, a plan recently approved for the nine-county San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose metropolitan area, proposes to spend $14 billion in subsidies for high density housing and $5 billion in subsidies for rail transit. Yet the combined effect of these subsidies will be to reduce the region’s green house gas emissions by less than 2 percent, at a cost of nearly $1,200 per ton of abated emissions. By contrast, a separate "climate initiative" program for the region includes projects such as car sharing, van pooling, and incentives for people to buy more fuel-efficient cars. It is expected to reduce the region’s emissions by nearly 3 percent, at a cost of just $22 per ton of abated emissions.

Planners are undiscouraged by the wastefulness of their density-and-transit programs. Laws passed in California, Florida, Oregon, and Washington require cities to implement such programs no matter how costly, and the Obama administration is offering cities in other states grants to encourage them to write such plans as well. These plans should be abandoned because they intrude on property rights and personal housing preferences and are cost-ineffective at saving energy and reducing emissions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: greenhouse gas, urban planning, emissions, land-use regulation, urban footprint, housing demand

JEL Classification: O18, R21, F64, P28, Q15, Q56

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2014  

Suggested Citation

O'Toole, Randal, Reducing Livability: How Sustainability Planning Threatens the American Dream (October 28, 2013). Policy Analysis No. 740. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2432314

Contact Information

Randal O'Toole (Contact Author)
Cato Institute ( email )
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-5403
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 120
Downloads: 21

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.313 seconds