Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2433820
 


 



Child Support Judgments: Comparing Public Policy to the Public's Policy


Ira Mark Ellman


Arizona State University College of Law; Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology

Stephen McKay


University of Lincoln, UK

Jo Miles


University of Cambridge

Caroline Bryson


Bryson Purdon Social Research

May 4, 2014

University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 34/2014

Abstract:     
Any child support regime necessarily makes policy choices about how parental income should be shared between the two parental households. Those choices involve balancing the claims of the child, the claims of the custodial parent for help with the expenses of providing for the child, and the claims of the support obligor for autonomy in deciding how to spend his own earnings. That balancing task is complicated by the fact that the child and the custodial parent necessarily share a living standard, so that any child support transfer, large or small, will unavoidably benefit the custodial parent as well as the child. This article reports the findings of an empirical study designed to reveal the policies favoured by the British public on these questions. It then compares the public's preferred policies to the policy choices implicit in the current UK child support schedule. It concludes that there are important gaps between the two, and recommends that consideration be given to amending the current UK law to better align it with the public's values on these matters. This paper, aimed at an academic audience, is a more comprehensive and technically complete presentation of an earlier paper, "Child Maintenance: How Much Should the State Require Fathers to Pay When Families Separate?", which was aimed at a general audience and published online as part of British Social Attitudes 2013.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: child support, child maintenance

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 8, 2014 ; Last revised: May 14, 2014

Suggested Citation

Ellman, Ira Mark and McKay, Stephen and Miles, Jo and Bryson, Caroline, Child Support Judgments: Comparing Public Policy to the Public's Policy (May 4, 2014). University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 34/2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2433820 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2433820

Contact Information

Ira Mark Ellman (Contact Author)
Arizona State University College of Law ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
480-965-2125 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.asu.edu/HomePages/Ellman/
Arizona State University (ASU) - Department of Psychology ( email )
Tempe, AZ 85287-1104
United States
Stephen McKay
University of Lincoln, UK ( email )
Brayford Pool
Lincoln, LN6 7TS
United Kingdom
+44 0 1522-886629 (Phone)
Jo Miles
University of Cambridge ( email )
10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Caroline Bryson
Bryson Purdon Social Research ( email )
10 Etherow Street
London, SE22 0JY
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://bpsr.co.uk/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 85
Downloads: 24

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds