Making Room for Cooperative Innovation
Emory University School of Law
May 9, 2014
41 Florida State University Law Review (2014)
Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-293
Patent law, created in response to a constitutional mandate to en-courage innovation, may be discouraging important forms of cooperative innovation. Advances in technology have enabled new ways of pooling knowledge and computational capabilities, facilitating cooperation among many participants with complementary skills and motivations to collectively solve complex problems. But emerging models of cooperative innovation increasingly run into patent roadblocks.
Why might patent law sometimes thwart instead of support socially beneficial cooperative innovation? The problem lies in the tensions between the market-based incentives that patent law creates and the mechanisms that support emerging models of cooperative innovation. The complexity and cost of solving contemporary public challenges are nudging diverse participants together to collectively build their knowledge, but patents often serve to keep them apart. While digital technologies enable new forms of massively distributed, open and collaborative intellectual production, patents threaten the vitality and even the viability of these promising types of innovation.
In this Article I use two examples – the risk of crowding out crowd science and the battle between proprietary software companies and free open source software platforms, to illustrate how patent law in its current form may sometimes impede beneficial cooperation in innovation. I then suggest how we might limit the negative effects of patents in contexts of cooperative innovation without undermining the patent system.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 73Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 10, 2014 ; Last revised: June 13, 2014
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.266 seconds