Abstract

 
 

Citations



 


 



Regulatory Reform and Bureaucratic Responsiveness to Firms: The
Impact of User Fees in the FDA


Mary K. Olson


Tulane University


Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 9, No. 3, Fall 2000

Abstract:     
This paper examines the impact of user fees on the speed of new drug review and on the responsiveness of FDA reviewers to pharmaceutical firms. User fees are expected to alter FDA behavior and responsiveness to pharmaceutical firms because they give regulators a financial incentive to process more new drug applications and because they convey information to regulators that may reduce type I error. The analysis examines the variation in FDA review times for new drugs approved between 1990-1995 as a function of differences that exist among firms
and drugs. Specifically, it compares estimates of regulator
responsiveness to several firm and drug characteristics before and after the introduction of user fees. The results show that user fees produced a significant change in FDA behavior. Regulators have become less responsive to the differences among firms after the introduction user fees which suggests that the reform has led to more equity in the new drug review process. In addition, the FDA has expedited the review of new drugs, especially the most therapeutically novel drugs which
suggests that politicians have been relatively successful in designing a reform to realign regulatory incentives in the FDA.

JEL Classification: D73, I18, L51, K2

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: October 18, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Olson, Mary K., Regulatory Reform and Bureaucratic Responsiveness to Firms: The Impact of User Fees in the FDA. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 9, No. 3, Fall 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=244086

Contact Information

Mary K. Olson (Contact Author)
Tulane University ( email )
Department of Economics
306 Tilton Hall
New Orleans, LA 70118
United States
504 862-8342 (Phone)
504 865-5869 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 441

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.453 seconds