Citations (2)



Terrorist Speech and the Future of Free Expression

Laura Donohue

Georgetown University Law Center


Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 27, pp. 233-341, 2005

The crucial point is this: Both liberal, democratic states, and non-state terrorist organizations need free speech. Prominent scholars have written elegantly and at length on the role of this liberty for the former. While their arguments surface at times in the text, the author does not dwell on them. Instead, she wrestles with the question: Under what circumstances are the interests of the state secured and the opportunism of terrorist organizations avoided? Here, the experiences of the United States and United Kingdom prove instructive. On both sides of the Atlantic, where the state acts as sovereign, efforts to restrict persuasive political speech have relaxed over time to allow for more criticism. In the United States, Brandenburg v. Ohio cemented this shift. In the United Kingdom, change came gradually. The practical elimination of treason and seditious libel, and incorporation of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) into domestic law through the 1998 Human Rights Act (HRA), marked the transition. If free speech remains central to our understanding of liberal democracy, it would nevertheless be naive to rely on these alterations to protect expression in the contemporary counter-terrorist environment-regardless of how remarkable they might be in the context of what went before.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 110

Keywords: freemom of speech, terrorist speech, persuasive speech

JEL Classification: K00, K30, K39

Download This Paper

Date posted: June 1, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Donohue, Laura, Terrorist Speech and the Future of Free Expression (2005). Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 27, pp. 233-341, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2443917

Contact Information

Laura Donohue (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202 662-9282 (Phone)
202 662-9282 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 131
Downloads: 13
Citations:  2

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds