Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2445697
 


 



Reasonability and Conscientious Objection in Medicine: A Reply to Marsh and an Elaboration of the Reason‐Giving Requirement


Robert F. Card


State University of New York - Department of Philosophy

July 2014

Bioethics, Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 320-326, 2014

Abstract:     
In this paper I defend the Reasonability View: the position that medical professionals seeking a conscientious exemption must state reasons in support of their objection and allow those reasons to be subject to evaluation. Recently, this view has been criticized by Jason Marsh as proposing a standard that is either too difficult to meet or too easy to satisfy. First, I defend the Reasonability View from this proposed dilemma. Then, I develop this view by presenting and explaining some of the central criteria it uses to assess whether a conscientious objection is proper grounds for extending an exemption to a medical practitioner.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: medical professionalism, conscience, philosophy of medicine

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: June 4, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Card, Robert F., Reasonability and Conscientious Objection in Medicine: A Reply to Marsh and an Elaboration of the Reason‐Giving Requirement (July 2014). Bioethics, Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 320-326, 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2445697 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12022

Contact Information

Robert F. Card (Contact Author)
State University of New York - Department of Philosophy ( email )
Oswego, NY 13126
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 37
Downloads: 0

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.218 seconds