Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=244748
 
 

Footnotes (87)



 


 



Apres Apprendi


Nancy J. King


Vanderbilt University - Law School

Susan R. Klein


University of Texas School of Law


Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 12, July-Aug. 2000

Abstract:     
The Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, ___ U.S. ___ (2000), held as a matter of due process that any fact, other than a prior conviction, that increases the penalty for an offense beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In a longer forthcoming article, we attempt to answer some of the profound questions raised by the case concerning constitutional oversight of legislative authority to define what is a "crime," questions that will ripen over the years as legislatures look for ways around the rule and litigants test these legislative reactions. In this shorter essay, we turn our focus to a more immediate problem facing those laboring in the criminal justice trenches: the correction of flawed judgments after Apprendi.

Apprendi threatens thousands of completed criminal prosecutions under dozens of existing state and federal statutes, of both the "add-on" and "nested" varieties. These statutes are collected in various Appendices. Whether relief is available to those sentenced under these statutes depends in part upon whether the Apprendi claim was raised on direct appeal or in a petition for collateral relief; whether the failure to treat a sentencing fact as an element was raised as a challenge to the indictment, to jury instructions at trial, to the validity of a guilty plea, or even as a claim of ineffective assistance; and whether the claim was properly preserved by the defense. These different contexts are considered separately. Also considered is the appropriate remedy for those who successfully navigate the procedural hurdles.

Note: The following is an updated version of the paper that appeared in the Federal Sentencing Reporter.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 14, 2000  

Suggested Citation

King, Nancy J. and Klein, Susan R., Apres Apprendi. Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 12, July-Aug. 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=244748 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.244748

Contact Information

Nancy J. King (Contact Author)
Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )
131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States
(615) 343-9836 (Phone)
(615) 322-6631 (Fax)
Susan R. Klein
University of Texas School of Law ( email )
727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1324 (Phone)
512-471-6988 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/sklein/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,294
Downloads: 119
Download Rank: 133,093
Footnotes:  87

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds