Large Capital Infusions, Investor Reactions, and the Return and Risk-Performance of Financial Institutions Over the Business Cycle
20 Pages Posted: 17 Jun 2014
There are 2 versions of this paper
Large Capital Infusions, Investor Reactions, and the Return and Risk-Performance of Financial Institutions Over the Business Cycle
Large Capital Infusions, Investor Reactions, and the Return and Risk-Performance of Financial Institutions Over the Business Cycle
Date Written: January 7, 2013
Abstract
We examine investors’ reactions to announcements of large capital infusions by U.S. financial institutions (FIs) from 2000 to 2009. These infusions include private market infusions (seasoned equity offerings (SEOs)) as well as injections of government capital under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). The sample period covers both business cycle expansions and contractions, and the recent financial crisis. We present evidence on the factors affecting FIs’ decisions to raise capital, the determinants of investor reactions, and post-infusion risk-taking of the recipients, as well as a sample of matching FIs. Investors reacted negatively to the news of private market SEOs by FIs, both in the immediate term (e.g., the two days surrounding the announcement) and over the subsequent year, but positively to TARP injections. Reactions differed depending on the characteristics of the FIs, and the stage of the business cycle. Smaller, more financially constrained non-bank institutions were more likely to have raised capital through private market offerings during the period prior to TARP, and firms receiving a TARP injection tended to be riskier and more levered. In the case of TARP recipients, they appeared to finance an increase in credit risk with more stable financing sources such as core deposits, which lowered their liquidity risk. However, we find no evidence that banks’ capital adequacy increased after the capital injections.
Keywords: Securities issuance, Market reaction, Financial service firms, Commercial banks, Government intervention
JEL Classification: F3
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Common (Stock) Sense about Risk-Shifting and Bank Bailouts
By Linus Wilson and Yan Wendy Wu
-
Debt Overhang and Bank Bailouts
By Linus Wilson
-
Debt Overhang and Bank Bailouts
By Linus Wilson
-
The Put Problem with Buying Toxic Assets
By Linus Wilson
-
By Linus Wilson
-
A Binomial Model of Geithner’s Toxic Asset Plan
By Linus Wilson
-
By Linus Wilson
-
Taking TARP Funds Can Be Hazardous to Your Bank's Wealth
By Dan J. Jordan, Douglas Rice, ...
-
Valuing the First Negotiated Repurchase of the TARP Warrants
By Linus Wilson
-
By Linus Wilson and Yan Wendy Wu