The Impact of Twitter Adoption on Lawmakers’ Voting Orientations

38 Pages Posted: 5 Aug 2014 Last revised: 29 Jan 2019

See all articles by Reza Mousavi

Reza Mousavi

University of Virginia

Bin Gu

Boston University - Questrom School of Business

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

Organizations have used social media extensively to engage customers, but little is known if such engagement truly influences organizations’ decisions to make them closer to their customers. This paper studies this question in a unique context – the impact of U.S. Representatives’ Twitter engagement on their voting behavior in The Congress. In particular, we consider whether the adoption and frequent use of Twitter make Representatives to vote more in line with the political orientation of their constituents. We constructed a panel data for 445 Members of the 111th U.S. House of Representatives across a period of 24 months. We exploit the variation in joining Twitter across Representatives to identify the impact of joining Twitter on voting behavior.

Using fixed effects and difference-in-difference approaches, we found that the adoption of Twitter by Representatives makes them to vote more in line with their constituents. We also found evidence that Representatives who generate more contents on Twitter tend to vote closer to the political orientation of their constituents.

Keywords: Online Social Networking, Societal Impact of IS, Decision-Making in Politics, U. S. House of Representatives, Panel Data, Difference-in-Difference Model

Suggested Citation

Mousavi, Reza and Gu, Bin, The Impact of Twitter Adoption on Lawmakers’ Voting Orientations (2014). APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2453006 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2453006

Reza Mousavi (Contact Author)

University of Virginia ( email )

1400 University Ave
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Bin Gu

Boston University - Questrom School of Business ( email )

595 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA MA 02215
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
228
Abstract Views
2,040
Rank
158,571
PlumX Metrics