Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2453128
 


 



Trust and Fiduciary Law


Matthew Harding


University of Melbourne - Law School

June 17, 2014

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol 33. No. 1, 2013
U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 686

Abstract:     
How can it be that the fiduciary relationship has trust at its core if trust is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for the existence of such a relationship? My aim in this article is to make some arguments that I think might assist in solving that puzzle. First, I argue that fiduciary relationships are likely to be characterized by relatively ‘thick’ interpersonal trust. Secondly, I argue that moral duties referring to trust play a role in the justification of fiduciary duties, but that the role of trust in the underlying moral duties is contingent, yielding only a contingent connection between trust and fiduciary duties. Finally, I argue that a goal of fiduciary law should be enabling and supporting trusting relationships, but that this goal should be viewed within a broader liberal outlook according to which fiduciary law also enables and supports relationships on terms of detachment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: equity, morality, normativity, discretion, private law, duty

JEL Classification: K00, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 17, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Harding, Matthew, Trust and Fiduciary Law (June 17, 2014). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol 33. No. 1, 2013; U of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 686. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2453128

Contact Information

Matthew Harding (Contact Author)
University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )
Victoria, 3010
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 98
Downloads: 51
Download Rank: 227,684

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.563 seconds