The Constitution of Authority
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law
June 17, 2014
Jurisprudence, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 430-441, 2014
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 14/58
This essay reconsiders Joseph Raz’s service conception of practical authority in light of his most recent work in legal philosophy. That work suggests that the normal justification thesis ought to be understood teleologically, as a principle of legitimacy which makes essential reference to the perfection of a subject’s faculty of Reason. The perfection of Reason is in turn characterised as maximal conformity to the reasons which apply to a person. These organizing ideas have not been sufficiently appreciated by earlier writers on the service conception, and they emphasise the theory’s affinity with classical Greek conceptions of authority and action. However, Raz’s excessive reliance on the notion of a reason, as a consideration counting in favour or against an action or belief, obscures other roles an authority can play in the thought and action of an obedient subject. As Raz’s theory of authority has become more refined and sophisticated over the years, its problems have become more salient; but its enduring influence and significance in the history of philosophy is now beyond doubt.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 19
Keywords: Joseph Raz, authority, jurisprudence, legitimacy, philosophy of law, reasons, teleology
JEL Classification: K10, K30
Date posted: June 19, 2014 ; Last revised: January 14, 2015
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.485 seconds