Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2456300
 
 

References (16)



 


 



'Open to Dispute': CODIS STR Loci as Private Medical Information


David H. Kaye


Penn State Law

February 17, 2014

Forensic Magazine, May 2014
Penn State Law Research Paper No. 23-2014

Abstract:     
In Maryland v. King, 133 S. Ct. 1958 (2013), the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of collecting and using DNA soon after a person is arrested. In doing so, the Court wrote that “[t]he argument that the testing at issue in this case reveals any private medical information at all is open to dispute.” Emphasizing that “[t]he CODIS loci are from the non-protein coding junk regions of DNA,” the majority of the Justices seemed to question whether it was even possible that “non-coding alleles could provide some information.”

But if the issue is open to dispute, what evidence is available to resolve it, and what should the scientific community, and forensic scientists in particular, do to help? This essay recommends that forensic analysts address this issue with caution in their testimony and writing, that they avoid the confusing phrase “junk DNA,” and that genomic databases and the biomedical literature be monitored regularly to assess the extent to which individuals with access to law enforcement databases could make valid inferences about an individual’s medically or socially sensitive phenotypes.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: law enforcement DNA databases, medical privacy, CODIS loci, ENCODE

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 23, 2014  

Suggested Citation

Kaye, David H., 'Open to Dispute': CODIS STR Loci as Private Medical Information (February 17, 2014). Forensic Magazine, May 2014; Penn State Law Research Paper No. 23-2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2456300

Contact Information

David H. Kaye (Contact Author)
Penn State Law ( email )
Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States
814 865-8974 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.psu.edu/faculty/resident_faculty/kaye
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 114
Downloads: 30
References:  16

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds