References (51)



The Elusive Safeguards of Federalism

Marci A. Hamilton

Cardozo Law School

Annals of Political and Social Science

The Supreme Court has issued a series of opinions that turn on the Constitution's inherent principles of federalism, decisions that have alarmed many a legal scholar. The Court has been attacked for overstepping its bounds, and by some, on the ground that the federalism/state balance should be maintained through the political process rather than judicial review. The most recent advocate of this position, Professor Larry Kramer, has argued that the political party structure ensures state interests are taken into account at the federal level, and therefore the Supreme Court need not and should not enforce federalism guarantees. This criticism of the judicial enforcement of federalism fails as a matter of constitutional history and on empirical grounds. The Supreme Court in this era deserves praise, not criticism, for its recent federalism jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 14, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Hamilton, Marci A., The Elusive Safeguards of Federalism. Annals of Political and Social Science. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=245808 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.245808

Contact Information

Marci A. Hamilton (Contact Author)
Cardozo Law School ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0215 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 935
Downloads: 166
Download Rank: 125,059
References:  51

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds