Behavioural Economics and Labour Law

Ewan McGaughey

King's College London - School of Law

June 30, 2014

LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 20/2014
King's College London Law School Research Paper No. 2015-04

Can behavioural economics help to make better labour law? This article traces the relationship between empirical work and legal thought, and focuses on new studies in behavioural economics and their potential implications for labour policy. Work by behavioural economists, and its implications, is discussed in four main fields of labour law policy: the effect of fair pay on the motivation to work; the effect of security in pay, and potentially job security, on productivity; the relevance of participation rights and job satisfaction in the workplace; and the differences between opting in and opting out of workplace schemes such as occupational pensions. Studies on these questions provide evidence that labour rights which correct inequality of bargaining power, protect security in pay and conditions and promote workplace participation redress significant market failures. If the thinking is careful and slow, behavioural economics seems indispensable to make better labour law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Behavioural economics, labour law, pensions, fairness, productivity, efficiency, nudge, rights, Coase

JEL Classification: D23, H30, J26, K31

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 16, 2014 ; Last revised: January 4, 2015

Suggested Citation

McGaughey, Ewan, Behavioural Economics and Labour Law (June 30, 2014). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 20/2014; King's College London Law School Research Paper No. 2015-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2460685 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2460685

Contact Information

Ewan McGaughey (Contact Author)
King's College London - School of Law ( email )
Somerset House East Wing
London, WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 884
Downloads: 189
Download Rank: 108,281
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.562 seconds